Stud Book
Browsing history:
Laud Eulogy (NZ) 1980
Laud Eulogy (NZ) 1980
- Born: 01/09/1980
- Age: 44
- Chestnut Horse
- Sire: ZAMAZAAN (FR) 1965
- Dam: GOLDEN PRAISE (NZ) 1970
- Overview
- Pedigree
- Broodmare
Daughters - Sire sons
- Dam Line
- Sire Line
- Stallion
Produce - Stallion
Fertility - Service
Fee
Foaling date: 01/09/1980
Death: -
Family: 22
DNA Typed: N
PV: N
BT: Y
Microchip: None
Life no: None
Left shoulder: Unknown
Right shoulder: Unknown
Breeder: D W Worth
Estae Lauda (NZ) 1989 | from | Pizzaz (AUS) 1984 |
River Gold (NZ) 1991 | from | Gambling Lass (NZ) 1983 |
Vyvyanne (NZ) 1990 | from | Felucca (NZ) 1974 |
Sire Line | Dam of Sire | |
---|---|---|
Zamazaan (FR) 1965 | from | Toyama (IRE) 1955 |
Exbury (FR) 1959 | from | Greensward (GB) 1953 |
Le Haar (FR) 1954 | from | Mince Pie (FR) 1949 |
Vieux Manoir (FR) 1947 | from | Vieille Maison (FR) 1936 |
Brantome (FR) 1931 | from | |
Blandford (IRE) 1919 | from | Blanche (GB) 1912 |
Swynford (GB) 1907 | from | |
John O'Gaunt (GB) 1901 | from | La Fleche (GB) 1889 |
Isinglass (GB) 1890 | from | |
Isonomy (GB) 1875 | from | Isola Bella |
Sterling (GB) 1868 | from |
Season | Mares Covered | Foals Living | Foals Dead & Slipped | Mares Exported | No Returns | Mares Dead | Missed Mares | Indeterminate Results | Fertility % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1989 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 77.78% |
1990 | 28 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 76.00% |
1991 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
1992 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 77.78% |
1993 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
1994 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
1995 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00% |
1996 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
Total | 75 | 42 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 79.41% |
Fertility Rate: This is worked out as the total number of foals (live, dead or slipped) as a percentage of total mares covered less exported, not returned, dead or indeterminate results.
Indeterminate Result: This exists where a mare is covered by more than one stallion and the result of these services is unable to be accurately credited to either of the respective stallions.